Salon meeting NieuwRechts

On Saturday May 24th 2025, the Tocqueville Network gathered for a salon meeting on politics, new media, and biases in reporting. Guests included Bart Reijmerink and Daniel de Liever, respectively editor-in-chief and editor at NieuwRechts.nl (NewRight). They position their platform as "decent right-wing at a high level"—a home for right-leaning views, shaped as an alliance of various contrarian thinkers. NieuwRechts reaches approximately two million people per month—comparable to GeenStijl—and has 5,000 paying members and 110,000 newsletter subscribers. The ambition is to grow to five to eight million monthly readers.
What did we discuss?
According to the speakers, traditional media are heavily dominated by the political left, while alternative voices often prove too polarising to appeal to a broader audience. NieuwRechts aims to break this tension by placing freedom of expression at the forefront, without resorting to agitation or partisan politics. The editorial team embraces pluralism, without binding itself to a fixed ideological framework. This sets NieuwRechts apart from both mainstream media and explicitly right-wing platforms such as De Dagelijkse Standaard.
There is also a clear intention not to remain stuck in negative reporting on Dutch politics, which is already abundant on social media. NieuwRechts seeks not to reinforce a sense of powerlessness, but instead to offer helpful criticism and otherwise constructive articles.
Political parties are increasingly approaching the platform directly. In each case, the editorial team weighs whether contributions align with the broader aim: a substantive, open discussion that allows for disagreement. A key objective here is to facilitate debate between the political left and right. So far, willingness to participate appears to come mainly from the right; responses from progressive circles remain limited.
Within the political right, however, the conversation is being actively pursued, especially around topics such as Russia and European cooperation. Regarding the war in Ukraine, for instance, NieuwRechts has published interviews with representatives from both the party of Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán and that of Ukrainian President Zelensky.
This means that the platform’s focus is not limited to domestic politics. Whereas many new media outlets concentrate exclusively on the Netherlands, NieuwRechts actively seeks international collaboration and inspiration—for example, with Hungary’s Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC) and the magazine The European Conservative.
This course demands constant reflection. When engaging with political parties and individuals whose views may be considered extreme, the challenge lies in giving underrepresented perspectives a platform without losing credibility. For complex topics, the editorial team therefore consults institutions such as the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) or the country’s Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS). Second opinions are also sought from international experts. This approach resonates with readers who, via social media, are already accustomed to receiving news from a variety of sources. By thus emphasising substantive assessment and avoiding sensationalism, NieuwRechts aims to avoid becoming a vehicle for unfounded conspiracy theories or other dubious claims.
Finally, NieuwRechts collaborates with influencers of diverse backgrounds, such as the centre-left Christian Democratic councillor Rogier Havelaar, in order to reach new audiences in a fragmented media landscape. The inclusion of such voices stretches the conventional boundaries between left and right.


What may we conclude?
NieuwRechts positions itself as an alternative within the media landscape: independent, pluralist, and content-driven. In a time when mainstream media and activist platforms are often at odds, this course offers a middle way. Through depth, international orientation, and space for dissenting views, the platform seeks to contribute to a broader, freer public debate.
The challenge remains to connect with a wider social mainstream. This requires careful editorial work, consistency, and openness to criticism—including from allies. Here NieuwRechts demonstrates thoughtfulness, whilst continuing to grow in reach and influence. Whether this combination can be sustained will depend on its ability to remain true to its original promise: a space for serious right-wing voices, without descending into caricature or dogma.
